Result
Essex
Middlesex
156/9 in 20.0
159/4 in 17.3
Middlesex beat Essex by 6 wickets
Middlesex beat Essex by 6 wickets
Batsman | R | B | 6S | 4S | SR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adam Rossington | 31 | 17 | 1 | 5 | 182.35 |
Dean Elgar | 32 | 22 | 0 | 5 | 145.45 |
Michael Pepper | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Paul Walter | 8 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 88.89 |
Matt Critchley | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 33.33 |
Charlie Allison | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 16.67 |
Luc Benkenstein | 26 | 21 | 1 | 2 | 123.81 |
Simon Harmer | 41 | 28 | 2 | 4 | 146.43 |
Shane Snater | 8 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 72.73 |
Samuel Cook | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
Bowler | O | M | R | W | ECO |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noah Cornwell | 4.0 | 0 | 41 | 1 | 10.25 |
Joshua Little | 4.0 | 0 | 25 | 1 | 6.25 |
Tom Helm | 4.0 | 0 | 32 | 4 | 8 |
Zafar Gohar | 4.0 | 0 | 31 | 1 | 7.75 |
Luke Hollman | 4.0 | 0 | 27 | 2 | 6.75 |
7 (W 7, B 0, LB 0)
156 (9 wkts, 20.0 ov)
Batsman | R | B | 6S | 4S | SR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stephen Eskinazi | 72 | 47 | 2 | 8 | 153.19 |
Kane Williamson | 31 | 28 | 1 | 2 | 110.71 |
Ben Geddes | 34 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 283.33 |
Leus du Plooy | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 50 |
Jack Davies | 12 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 100 |
Ryan Higgins | 8 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 200 |
Bowler | O | M | R | W | ECO |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shane Snater | 2.0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 10 |
Simon Harmer | 3.0 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 7 |
Mohammad Amir | 3.0 | 0 | 27 | 0 | 9 |
Samuel Cook | 2.0 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 8 |
Matt Critchley | 2.3 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 10 |
Paul Walter | 3.0 | 0 | 34 | 2 | 11.33 |
Luc Benkenstein | 2.0 | 0 | 16 | 1 | 8 |
1 (W 1, B 0, LB 0)
159 (4 wkts, 17.3 ov)
In a clash of two winless teams desperate to kickstart their campaigns, Essex host Middlesex at Chelmsford. Both sides are languishing at the bottom of the South Group table, with Essex losing all three of their games so far and Middlesex slightly ahead courtesy of a no-result against Kent.
Essex’s last outing was a disheartening 6-wicket defeat to Glamorgan, where despite a spirited 60 from Michael Pepper and a quick 32 from Dean Elgar, their bowling lacked penetration. The experienced Simon Harmer and Paul Walter each took a couple of wickets, but the attack was largely ineffective on a good batting surface. With a dismal net run rate of -2.702, Essex urgently need a turnaround — particularly from senior bowlers like Mohammad Amir and Sam Cook, who have been far from threatening.
Middlesex, meanwhile, showed glimpses of potential with the bat in the rain-affected game at Lord’s. Zak Crawley’s 57 and Bell-Drummond’s 34 set the foundation, but frequent collapses and a lack of finishing power remain an issue. The bowling, however, was encouraging — with Tom Helm taking 3/29 and Hollman impressing in the middle overs. Joshua Little has yet to find his rhythm, but there's quality in the attack if it clicks.
Chelmsford has historically favoured aggressive batting with some turn on offer for spinners. With both sides struggling to find winning form, this could be a scrappy but high-stakes encounter. Expect Essex to lean on their home familiarity, but Middlesex’s deeper bowling could make the difference.
Bet on Middlesex to win.
Dhruv Gupta is a seasoned cricket analyst passionate about numbers and patterns. He brings a data-driven approach to his cricket predictions.
In play
Chepauk Super Gillies VS
Lyca Kovai Kings
Chepauk Super Gillies to win
Baba Aparajith to score over 24.5 runs
Highest individual score Over 61.5
In 3 hours
Dindigul Dragons VS
Siechem Madurai Panthers
Dindigul Dragons to win
First dismissal of the match to be LBW
First ball of the Match to be a Dot Ball
In 3 hours
West Indies Women VS
South Africa Women
South Africa Women to win
The top batter of the contest to score less than 82 runs
The first over of the South African innings to raise three or fewer than three runs
Join the fans today and get expert tips and predictions on international and domestic matches, Dream11 picks and much more.
18+. This game may be habit-forming or financially risky. Please play responsibly.
ocbscores.com has no affiliation with the cricket teams, tournaments or organizations displayed on this website. We claim no credit for any associated images posted on the site unless otherwise noted. Images are copyright to their respective owners.
Furthermore, the odds displayed on our website are for informational purposes only and can not be wagered on. We are not a betting site and do not accept bets from players. We do not endorse illegal gambling. Please check the online gambling regulation in your jurisdiction before placing any bets on any betting sites advertised on our website.
Copyright © 2009-2025 OCBScores.com. All rights reserved.