Result
Essex
Somerset
148/10 in 19.1
149/2 in 15.5
Somerset beat Essex by 8 wickets
Somerset beat Essex by 8 wickets
Batsman | R | B | 6S | 4S | SR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adam Rossington | 4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 100 |
Dean Elgar | 50 | 37 | 2 | 5 | 135.14 |
Michael Pepper | 7 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 100 |
Paul Walter | 6 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 75 |
Matt Critchley | 54 | 31 | 4 | 3 | 174.19 |
Charlie Allison | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 60 |
Luc Benkenstein | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 50 |
Simon Harmer | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Shane Snater | 15 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 150 |
Samuel Cook | 4 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 40 |
Mohammad Amir | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bowler | O | M | R | W | ECO |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Craig Overton | 3.0 | 0 | 24 | 1 | 8 |
Matt Henry | 4.0 | 0 | 28 | 1 | 7 |
Riley Meredith | 4.0 | 0 | 18 | 2 | 4.5 |
Lewis Goldsworthy | 2.0 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 10.5 |
Lewis Gregory | 3.1 | 0 | 26 | 2 | 8.21 |
Ben Green | 3.0 | 0 | 30 | 3 | 10 |
4 (W 1, B 0, LB 1)
148 (10 wkts, 19.1 ov)
Batsman | R | B | 6S | 4S | SR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Will Smeed | 81 | 54 | 1 | 11 | 150 |
Tom Lammonby | 36 | 22 | 2 | 3 | 163.64 |
Tom Kohler Cadmore | 15 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 214.29 |
Thomas Abell | 10 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 83.33 |
Bowler | O | M | R | W | ECO |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mohammad Amir | 3.0 | 0 | 39 | 0 | 13 |
Samuel Cook | 2.0 | 0 | 27 | 0 | 13.5 |
Shane Snater | 3.0 | 0 | 23 | 0 | 7.67 |
Matt Critchley | 3.0 | 0 | 26 | 1 | 8.67 |
Simon Harmer | 2.5 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 4.24 |
Luc Benkenstein | 2.0 | 0 | 18 | 1 | 9 |
7 (W 3, B 0, LB 4)
149 (2 wkts, 15.5 ov)
Based on recent form and performance, Somerset head into their June 1 clash against Essex at the County Ground in Chelmsford as the clear favorites. Essex are coming off a bruising 106-run loss to Hampshire, a match in which their bowling unit was dismantled—conceding 230 runs in 20 overs—with key bowlers like Amir and Cook proving expensive and ineffective.
Their batting was equally brittle, collapsing to 124 all out in 16.2 overs, exposing the lack of depth and resilience in their middle order. In contrast, Somerset showcased both discipline and flair in a confident 5-wicket victory over a strong Surrey side. Their bowlers, led by Matt Henry (3/21) and Riley Meredith (3/26), restricted Surrey to 146, and the batting unit chased it down clinically with Tom Abell anchoring the innings and Smeed, Banton, and Green providing fluent cameos.
Somerset’s pace attack has bite, and their batting lineup is dynamic yet balanced. Essex do have explosive players—Michael-Kyle Pepper was impressive with 51 in the last match—but their overreliance on individual sparks rather than a cohesive team performance is proving costly. While Chelmsford’s shorter boundaries might assist Essex’s aggressive intent, Somerset’s more in-form and tactically astute side is better positioned to exploit pressure situations.
Unless Essex produce something special—particularly with the ball—Somerset should extend their winning run.
Bet on Somerset to win.
Dhruv Gupta is a seasoned cricket analyst passionate about numbers and patterns. He brings a data-driven approach to his cricket predictions.
In play
Punjab Kings
Mumbai Indians
49/1 in 4.5
203/6 in 20.0
Mumbai Indians to win
Suryakumar Yadav to score Over 29.5 runs
Total runs - Over 372.5
Join the fans today and get expert tips and predictions on international and domestic matches, Dream11 picks and much more.
18+. This game may be habit-forming or financially risky. Please play responsibly.
ocbscores.com has no affiliation with the cricket teams, tournaments or organizations displayed on this website. We claim no credit for any associated images posted on the site unless otherwise noted. Images are copyright to their respective owners.
Furthermore, the odds displayed on our website are for informational purposes only and can not be wagered on. We are not a betting site and do not accept bets from players. We do not endorse illegal gambling. Please check the online gambling regulation in your jurisdiction before placing any bets on any betting sites advertised on our website.
Copyright © 2009-2025 OCBScores.com. All rights reserved.