Spot Fixing in Cricket: The Dark Side of Cricket Explained
Written by: OCB Editorial Team • 16.09.2025

Cricket is loved around the world for its drama, skill, and tradition. From packed stadiums in India to the village greens of England, millions of fans tune in to watch matches in the international cricket calendar all year round.
If you enjoy online cricket betting, you already know how unpredictable the sport can be. But alongside the excitement lies a darker issue: spot fixing. You may have heard of match fixing, where entire results are manipulated.
Spot fixing, however, is more subtle, often hiding in plain sight. It is a practice that has rocked cricket at different points in history, leading to scandals, bans, and damaged reputations.
In this guide, we'll explain what is spot fixing in cricket, how it works, and why it matters if you’re betting on the game. We'll explore infamous cases, explain the difference between spot fixing and match fixing, and look at how cricket authorities are fighting back.
Whether you’re new to cricket betting or a seasoned pro, this guide will help you spot the warning signs while enjoying the sport you love.
What is a Spot-Fixing in Cricket?
At its simplest, spot fixing meaning refers to when a player deliberately manipulates a specific part of a cricket match without altering the overall result. Unlike match fixing, which aims to change the outcome, spot fixing focuses on small, pre-arranged events. E.g. a bowler might agree to bowl a no-ball in the third over, or a batter might deliberately score fewer runs during a certain spell. Bettors in the know can place money on these micro-events in special betting markets, earning huge profits. |
So, what is the meaning of spot fixing in cricket? It’s when the integrity of one tiny piece of the game is manipulated for betting gains. While the match might still look fair, those specific actions have been staged.
Spot fixing vs match fixing
They sound similar, but are slightly different. Think of match fixing as rewriting the entire script of a film. The winner, the storyline, and the ending are all manipulated. Spot fixing, on the other hand, is like changing a single scene while the rest of the movie plays out naturally.
In cricket terms, match fixing might involve ensuring Team A loses the game. Spot fixing could be something as minor as ensuring a wide ball is bowled at a certain point.
This is crucial for bettors. If you’re placing bets on outcomes like “number of wides in the first ten overs”, you can see how a single dishonest delivery can distort the market.
How specific betting markets are targeted by spot-fixing
Modern betting markets, especially online, offer an incredible variety of wagers beyond just who wins or loses. These are called proposition bets (or prop bets). Examples include:
- Who will win the toss
- How many runs will be scored in the first over
- Will a specific player hit a six
These micro-bets are where spot fixing thrives. Because the outcomes are small and fast, corrupt cricket players can influence them without raising much suspicion.
Why spot-fixing is harder to detect
Authorities can often catch large-scale match fixing because the results look suspicious. Spot fixing is trickier. A no-ball, a dropped catch, or a mistimed shot can happen naturally in cricket. That makes it tough to prove intent.
For anti-corruption units, separating genuine errors from deliberate manipulation requires evidence like phone records, undercover investigations, or whistle-blowers.
Expert Perspective: Dhruv’s Opinion
Our in-house cricket strategist Dhruv has this to say about spot fixing:
“Spot fixing is particularly damaging because it erodes trust in the smallest details of the sport. A fan should be able to believe that every ball, every shot, and every call is genuine. When that trust is broken, cricket suffers more than any scoreboard can show.”
Beyond the damage to the sport’s image, Dhruv also points out that spot fixing can ripple into the betting world.
"When markets are manipulated, honest bettors face skewed odds and unfair losses. This creates mistrust not only in players but in the entire system surrounding cricket. For the game to thrive, education for young cricketers and strong monitoring by integrity units are vital steps toward safeguarding cricket’s future."

Join our cricket betting community
Follow us on social media to stay up to date!
Notable Spot Fixing Cases in Cricket History
Spot fixing scandals have surfaced multiple times, shaking fans’ confidence. Let’s look at some of the most infamous.
2010 Pakistan tour of England: No-ball scandal
Perhaps the most famous case came at Lord’s in 2010. Pakistani players Salman Butt, Mohammad Asif, and Mohammad Amir were caught deliberately bowling no-balls as arranged with a bookmaker.
The scandal shocked the cricket world because it involved a young fast bowler, Amir, once hailed as the future of Pakistan cricket. The spot fixing scandal in cricket resulted in bans and even prison sentences, highlighting how severe the consequences can be.
2013 IPL arrests: Sreesanth and Rajasthan Royals
The Indian Premier League has always attracted huge betting interest, and unfortunately, controversy too. In 2013, Rajasthan Royals players Sreesanth, Ajit Chandila, and Ankeet Chavan were arrested for agreeing to manipulate specific overs.
Although some charges were later dropped, the scandal tarnished reputations and led to life bans. It showed how T20 formats, with their fast pace and endless betting opportunities, can be fertile ground for corruption.
Mervyn Westfield and Essex Pro40 match
In 2012, English cricketer Mervyn Westfield became the first professional player in England to be convicted of spot fixing. He admitted accepting money to bowl poorly during a domestic limited-overs match.
His case proved that spot fixing wasn’t confined to international games. Even lower-profile fixtures were vulnerable, especially where players were underpaid.
2012 IPL sting operation: Five players suspended
A TV sting in India caught several domestic cricketers on camera allegedly agreeing to spot fix in return for money. The BCCI responded by suspending five players.
This case raised big questions about corruption at grassroots and domestic levels, reminding fans that vigilance is needed across all formats.
How Spot Fixing Operates in Modern Cricket
In today’s game, technology and betting have expanded side markets dramatically. From mobile apps to live, in-play betting, opportunities to exploit cricket’s smallest moments have multiplied.
Use of proposition bets in T20 and ODI formats
Shorter formats like T20 and ODI cricket are particularly attractive for spot fixers. Every ball carries weight, and the pace means bettors can place dozens of quick wagers.
A batter “getting out under 20 runs” or “number of extras in the powerplay” are easy targets for manipulation.
For those of you who want to keep up with all the latest news and opinions, check out the OCB Cricket Blog, for weekly insights from our experts.
Challenges in Detection and Regulation
Despite progress by cricket bodies, spot fixing still poses a threat. The growth of global betting markets, especially online and in-play platforms, has created endless micro-events that can be manipulated in subtle ways.
Even with modern monitoring systems, tracking suspicious activity across hundreds of international, domestic, and franchise tournaments is a huge task.
Another difficulty lies in how the sport is perceived. Cricket is filled with natural errors - a mistimed shot, a fumbled catch, or an unexpected wide happen, so proving that these moments were deliberate is often extremely hard.
While anti-corruption units run education programmes and player awareness workshops, the sheer volume of matches and players involved in the global cricket ecosystem means no system can ever be airtight.
Ultimately, the fight against spot fixing is a constant battle, balancing vigilance with fairness to players who may simply have made an honest mistake.
Limitations of anti-corruption units
The ICC’s Anti-Corruption Unit monitors betting patterns, conducts player education, and investigates suspicious activity. But with countless domestic leagues and matches in the cricket schedule, monitoring every game is near impossible.
Corruptors also adapt quickly, using encrypted apps, burner phones and coded language, which makes it harder for authorities to keep up.
Legal hurdles in proving intent
Even when suspicious actions occur, proving that they were deliberate is difficult. Courts require strong evidence, often beyond what betting records alone can show.
Players caught in stings or admitting guilt face bans, but many cases collapse due to lack of evidence. This creates frustration for fans and regulators alike.
Conclusion
Spot fixing may not always decide who wins or loses, but it undermines cricket’s credibility in ways that go far beyond the scoreboard. By now, you understand what is the meaning of spot fixing in cricket, how it differs from match fixing, and why it matters for both fans and bettors.
For you as a bettor, knowledge is your strongest defence. By recognising the risks, following reputable markets, and staying aware of cricket’s darker side, you can continue to enjoy the sport with confidence.
The good news? Cricket remains resilient. Authorities, players, and fans alike are working hard to protect the integrity of the game. And as long as fans like you keep demanding fairness, cricket will always have more bright days than dark scandals.
Be sure to check out our expert Cricket Guides for more deep dives and insights.
FAQs
Spot fixing is when a specific moment in a match, like a no-ball or wide, is deliberately manipulated for betting purposes without changing the overall result.
One of the most infamous was the 2010 Pakistan tour of England, where players were caught bowling deliberate no-balls for money.
Match fixing changes the entire outcome, while spot fixing only manipulates small events within the game.
Because small mistakes like wides or dropped catches can happen naturally, it’s challenging to prove intent without strong evidence.